Pedestrian View Of Los Angeles

This blog focuses on rail lines in LA country that exist, are under construction or under consideration. The Californian high-speed rail project and southern CA to Vegas project will also be covered. Since most of the relevant developments in the news, rail websites and blogosphere take place on weekdays, this blog will be updated primarily Monday through Friday and occasionally on the weekends. Your comments, criticism and suggestions are encouraged. Miscellaneous stuff will also appear here.

More content as you stroll down on the right side

1. Blog Archive
2.
Blog List and Press Releases
3.
My Blog List
4.
Rail Lines: Existing, Under Construction and Under Consideration
5.
Share It
6.
Search This Blog
7.
Followers
8.
About Me
9.
Feedjit Live Traffic Feed

Friday, June 4, 2010

China's future on fast track

China's future on fast track

Fast train

This bullet train is claimed to be the fastest in the world, travelling at 350km/h between Guangzhou and Wuhan.

THEY'RE calling it The New Silk Road: an ambitious plan by the Chinese to build two direct rail links to Europe, one from Beijing to London, the other from Beijing to Berlin, via a super high-speed train service travelling at almost half the cruising speed of a 747.

The Chinese Government, already in serious negotiations with 17 countries, also wants to build a third link through Burma, Thailand, Malaysia and Singapore. It claims the Herculean task could be completed in as little as a decade and has offered to cough up the money for the infrastructure – in return for cut-price raw materials, which it can transport cheaply back to its manufacturing centres.

In January, China opened what it billed as the fastest rail service in the world – a bullet train travelling at a top speed of 350km/h between the cities of Guangzhou and Wuhan, slicing the previous journey time from 10 hours to just three. Within three years China will have 800 bullet trains criss-crossing its territory, and it is already in the throes of building high-speed rail lines in Turkey, Saudi Arabia and Venezuela.

In a somewhat uncertain time for air travel, China appears to have decided high-speed rail offers a good back-up strategy for moving people and resources. Already its international building spree is outstripping that of colonial Britain, which cemented its economic power in India in the 18th and 19th centuries.

Like the lucrative silk and spice trade that opened up a link between Asia and Europe more than 2000 years ago, optimists argue that the giant railways will herald a new era of inter-connectedness between Europe and China.

The less dewy-eyed, however, worry about China’s greater ability to exploit resources in developing countries (a pipeline between Turkmenistan and China’s Xinjiang province will remove more than half of that country’s natural gas deposits, for example) and its growing influence in the Middle East (especially in troublesome Iran).

In short, a new silk road paving the way for 21st-century Chinese dominance.

Bullet train to devise backup funding plan

Bullet train to devise backup funding plan

SILICON VALLEY / SAN JOSE BUSINESS JOURNAL - BY Eric Young SAN FRANCISCO BUSINESS TIMES



California’s bullet-train executives said Thursday they will study backup plans to pay for the $42.6 billion project if current plans fall through.

The California High-Speed Rail Authority has said it intends to pay for the undertaking, the largest infrastructure project in state history, through a combination of bonds, taxpayer money and private financing.

But the rail authority’s financing plans came under fire recently by the state auditor. In its report, the auditor’s office said plans to build California’s high-speed rail system risk delay due to “inadequate planning, weak oversight and lax contract management.”

The report saved its most pointed criticism for the rail authority’s finances. The auditor’s report said the rail authority estimated last year it needs up to $19 billion in federal money to build the 800-mile system connecting Southern California and the Bay Area. But the authority has no federal commitments beyond $2.25 billion, the report said.

The authority’s plan for spending includes almost $12 billion in federal and state funds through 2013, more than 2.5 times what is now available, the state auditor said.

The rail authority, at its Thursday board of directors meeting, said staffers are working on “a set of alternative project funding scenarios based on best and worst case projected funding outcomes.”

The state’s high-speed rail authority hopes to finalize a bullet train route by 2011 and begin construction by 2012.

In addition, the agency on Thursday released its study on possible locations for stations and tracks for the San Jose to Merced and Fresno to Bakersfield segments of the rail line.

Based on feedback from more than 100 meetings with community leaders, local officials and residents, the California High-Speed Rail Authority’s Preliminary Alternatives Analyses looked at potential station locations and track alignments to decide which ones need further study and to eliminate others due to environmental concerns or impracticality.

The analysis for the San Jose to Merced leg found that an elevated station above the exisiting Caltrain Diridon Station in San Jose would maximize connectivity and development potential in the area.

It also recommends running the track for the approach to the Diridon station along the State Route 87/Interstate 280 freeway corridors to minimize impacts to the Greater Gardener neighborhoods in San Jose.

The full text of the release is available here.



Read more: Bullet train to devise backup funding plan - Silicon Valley / San Jose Business Journal 

Thursday, June 3, 2010

Farmdale Station Idea for Expo Still Getting No Love from Locals (Source: la.curbed.com)



Farmdale Station Idea for Expo Still Getting No Love from Locals

Wednesday, June 2, 2010, by Neal Broverman

When it comes to the under-construction Expo Line light rail that'll go from downtown to Culver City, the street-level crossing at Farmdale Avenue near Dorsey High School is one of the more controversial issues. Locals, as well as groups like Damien Goodmon's Fix Expo, have stated the crossing will create a situation that'll see kids inevitably get hurt or killed. The California Public Utilities Commission, the state agency that regulates railroad safety, initially agreed the crossing was not safe enough and Expo came back with a new option: a station at Farmdale where trains would cross the intersection at 15 mph before making a complete stop. TheCPUC, who will ultimately decide if the station option is safe enough, sponsored a community meeting last night at the high school. The majority of residents, students, and parents were dead-set against an at-grade station, asking if Culver City and USC have stations that go above or underground, why can't they? One resident said the train was being grade-separated for cars and industrial/business areas, e.g. La Brea and La Cienega, but not people, e.g. the busy pedestrian crossing at Farmdale.

Groups supporting the current Farmdale station configuration and those against it, both had tables set up outside the meeting.

CPUC commissioner Timothy Alan Simon and Administrative Law Judge for CPUC Maribeth Bushey introduced themselves promptly at 6 p.m., and apologized for the inconvenience some may have experienced with the date and time of the meeting (FixExpo had complained about the meeting and parking issues because of concurrent events at the high school, but there was a shuttle service provided for people to get to their cars).

Eric Olson, the chief project manager for Expo, gave a short presentation on the line (construction about 65% complete) and the new station proposal.

Olson said the station would provide mobility and investment in the community, and that the Los Angeles Unified School District (LAUSD) is supportive of the station proposal. Olson also stated that train operators would only start moving at the Farmdale station when he or she was verified the pedestrian crossing is clear. The area will also benefit from improved street lightning, crosswalks, and a parking lot, he said.

Next up was Goodmon of Fix Expo, who spoke calmly but forcefully about the line and safety. He said the community shouldn't have to choose between access and safety, and that the renderings presented by Expo do not present an accurate picture of what DHS would be like at 3 p.m.

He showed a video of kids milling about and cars forced to stop for them. He added that crossing gates will not be effective, and eventually the trains will increase speed from 15 mph, producing a memo that insinuated Metro had plans to do that in the future. He, and his group, want the line put in a trench (like at USC) or on a Chicago-style riser (like at La Brea and La Cienega.)

Next up were public speakers. About 80% spoke out passionately against the at-grade crossing. No one said they didn't want the train, but rather desiring an above or underground station. Someone worried about gang activity (like gunfire or a fight) and whether that would push kids from the so-called "holding pens," where people will wait as the train crosses Farmdale, into the path of a train. And while others argued that kids would dare each other to race the train, pro-Farmdale station people brought up the point that schools adjacent to the Gold Line have not had one fatality.

Dorsey teachers like Marlene Carter and students like Jevante Davis were not convinced, all saying the staff and students overwhelmingly want the crossing in a trench or on a riser.

Many people remain upset with the fact that, according to FixExpo, $185 million is being spent on the one mile of the line west of La Cienega, but $140 million for the 4.5 miles of the line in South LA. Most of the people voicing support for the Farmdale station were not from the area, but from those who will live near the line's second phase in West LA and members of Friends 4 Expo, a group advocating for the line--they mostly said at-grade systems are successful in San Francisco and Europe, and that the kids should be trusted to cross the street. Other supporters of the Farmdale station option included residents who were employed by the line.

CPUC judge Bushey, who will decide whether the Farmdale station is an acceptable option, would not give a timeline on when that decision might come. But the consensus seems to be sometime this summer (with more public comment coming, too). If she decides the crossing needs to be grade-separated, it'll be interesting to see it if sets a precedent for others calling for grade-separation, like homeowners inCheviot Hills and the South Bay. And if the judge says the station option is acceptable, the community will likely be furious. Basically, one side will likely be unhappy when the train finally starts rolling along Exposition.

Measure R Independent Taxpayers Oversight Committee of Metro Meets Thursday (Source: lastreetsblog.com)

Measure R Independent Taxpayers Oversight Committee of Metro Meets Thursday

Screen_shot_2010_06_03_at_6.58.19_AM.pngImage: Metro.net

You'll remember in April, while discussing the obscure Independent Citizens' Advisory and Oversight Committee (ICAOC), I mentioned the start-up of the Measure R Independent Taxpayers Oversight Committee was impending.

The hold up was the appointment of the three Committee members. Measure R dictates the panel shall be made up of retired judges, with one appointment each by the Mayor of Los Angeles, the County Supervisors and the "other cities" of the county (similar to the way Board seats are divided).

The Committee members are: 

  • Justice Candace Cooper (appointed by L.A. Mayor Villaraigosa)
  • Judge Richard Kolostian (appointed by the "other cities")
  • Judge Robert W. Parkin (appointed by the L.A. County Supervisors)

June 3rd the Committee has its first meeting in the Metro Board Conference Room, starting at 1:30 p.m.

One of the first tasks the Committee members face is appointing the members of its advisory panel. Measure R states the members shall consist of at least one representative, and not more than two, of the following professions or areas of expertise:

a. Construction trade labor union representative

b. Environmental engineer or environmental scientist

c. Road or rail construction firm project manager

d. Public and private finance expert

e. Regional association of businesses representative

f. Transit system user

The staff report gives a good overview of the Committee's purpose and other legal type stuff.

Evidently much like the aforementioned ICAOC, this body was seen as being a selling point for the voters. I guess having retired judges gives it an aura of authority and impartiality. Such is the way policy often zigs and zags, shaped as much as anything by perceptions and political realities.