Pedestrian View Of Los Angeles

This blog focuses on rail lines in LA country that exist, are under construction or under consideration. The Californian high-speed rail project and southern CA to Vegas project will also be covered. Since most of the relevant developments in the news, rail websites and blogosphere take place on weekdays, this blog will be updated primarily Monday through Friday and occasionally on the weekends. Your comments, criticism and suggestions are encouraged. Miscellaneous stuff will also appear here.

More content as you stroll down on the right side

1. Blog Archive
2.
Blog List and Press Releases
3.
My Blog List
4.
Rail Lines: Existing, Under Construction and Under Consideration
5.
Share It
6.
Search This Blog
7.
Followers
8.
About Me
9.
Feedjit Live Traffic Feed

Monday, December 21, 2009

Japan ups pace in race for U.S. bullet train deal

By JAY ALABASTER

The Associated Press

NAGOYA — On a desolate stretch of track just before midnight, when all passenger lines have been put to bed, a juiced-up bullet train goes online and accelerates to over 320 kph. The 700-ton train, about 400 meters long, whooshes by rice paddies in under 5 seconds. There are no locals around to witness the train glide to a stop at a deserted Kyoto Station, but that's not the point. This is an accelerated sales pitch aimed squarely at the U.S., where Japan is competing with European train makers for a new high-speed train network that could deliver contracts worth hundreds of billions.

Diplomats, business leaders and journalists were crammed in to watch special speedometers record the feat last month, the first time Central Japan Railway Co. (JR Tokai) has allowed outsiders to join a test run. Rivals abroad said Japanese trains weren't up to spec, and JR Tokai wanted to set the record straight.

"In France and Germany they have been saying we can only do 280 kph, so we had to demonstrate," JR Tokai Chairman Yoshiyuki Kasai said.

That Japan's bottlenose bullet trains can hold their own against overseas models has long been a point of pride. But now a massive sales race is under way. While the majority of services to date have been built in Europe, where makers like France's Alstom and Germany's Siemens dominate, governments around the world are looking to upgrade as existing lines age.

A diverse group of countries is at various stages of introducing supertrains, including Russia, the U.K., Vietnam and Brazil, but the U.S. is the ultimate prize.

President Barack Obama's stimulus package included an $8 billion provision for high-speed trains, and some say eventually $600 billion will be needed for a nationwide network. Japan's exports to the U.S. last year totaled about $140 billion.

A high-speed network would drastically cut U.S. train times. The Washington-to-New York route would drop from 2 1/2 hours to about 70 minutes, according to Kasai. That would create a viable alternative to planes and cars, cutting down on traffic and depositing travelers at stations that are often in the city center.

Some analysts question whether cash-strapped Washington can afford to follow up the initial provision with more funds. But building new train lines can also be a vote winner, hitting political touchstones like jobs and reduced pollution.

JR Tokai, one of the operators created when the Japanese National Railway was privatized in 1987, is leading the charge in the U.S., but is also taking a risky winner-takes-all approach. The carrier is pitching a total package covering everything from train cars to signals to maintenance machinery and even employee instruction — even though many in the industry prefer to rely on a variety of suppliers.

Few countries have the technology to safely move passengers and hundreds of tons of train so swiftly.

Japan was an early innovator, launching services in 1964 to coincide with the Tokyo Olympics. Rivals with more experience at exporting include Alstom, a world leader by market share, and Siemens, which already has a light rail factory in Sacramento, Calif. Both have 320-kph trains in Europe and have said they will pursue the rail dollars from Washington.

Japan is hoping its close political ties to the U.S. will give its sales pitch a boost. When Obama visited Tokyo last month, Prime Minister Yukio Hatoyama highlighted Japanese trains and handed over promotional DVDs.

The country has had some success abroad. Earlier this week the U.K. launched its first high-speed service using trains made by Hitachi. In Vietnam, a major recipient of Japanese government financial assistance, officials have said they want to use Japan's technology for a new train network that may include high-speed services.

JR Tokai runs high-speed services on the prized routes from Tokyo to Kyoto and Osaka, and designs and operates its own fleet. Bullet trains built by the company are currently used in a high-speed network in Taiwan, the first time they were sold abroad.

But that $18 billion project combines the Japanese train cars with technologies from other countries, a hodgepodge solution that JR Tokai wants to avoid in the U.S., because it means modifying proven technologies and a smaller paycheck.

"This is not a system that can be divided up into parts, and we are proposing adoption of the entire system," said Tsutomu Morimura, an executive in charge of JR Tokai's technology division.

Morimura says this is the only way to employ the company's advanced technology and guarantee a safe and efficient system. Rail experts agree that Japan's train tech is among the best in the world, but wonder whether an all-or-nothing approach will work in the U.S.

"If you rely totally and completely on a single country, when a problem arises there is a lot of risk, so the fundamental stance of many buyers is not to rely on the technology from one country," said Credit Suisse analyst Osuke Itazaki.

Robert Eckels, chairman of Texas High Speed Rail Corp., which is working to bring such a system to the state, was present at the demonstration in Japan. He was impressed but wasn't sure how the company's all-in-one pitch would play out in the States.

Unlike in Europe, where border crossings and ensuring compatibility on differing rail networks are prerequisites for doing business, Japan's trains have been developed on an island, with homegrown technology. Other Japanese industries with enviable but incompatible technologies, like its mobile phone operators, haven't fared well in repeated attempts to go abroad.

Another wrinkle: Japan's high-speed trains run on their own tracks, with no crossings and dedicated bridges over crowded areas. Building such lines from scratch in the U.S. would be costly, but executives like Morimura say it's an advantage to be unconstrained by the standards of conventional networks.

Bullet trains do have an impressive history. No passengers have died from a derailment or collision in nearly a half century of service, with the only derailment during a major earthquake in 2004. The average delay for JR Tokai services each year, despite hundreds of trains each day, is typically less than a minute.

For Japan, billions in contracts would be a welcome boost as the economy begins to recover from recession, and help stir national pride.

The shinkansen are a symbol of the country's technological prowess here, where services have names like "Hope" and "Light," and miniature replicas are popular with children.

When one of the original trains was retired and put on display at a museum on the outskirts of Tokyo earlier this year, some 16,000 visitors crammed in during the first week to take pictures and rub its elongated nose.

The Japan Times

(C) All rights reserved

Roundup on Articles on the Gold Line

Article 1

Advocates push for Gold Line extension

Dec. 19, 2009 | KPCC Wire Services

GLENDORA — Political leaders in eastern Los Angeles County plan to press the Metropolitan Transit Authority board to expedite funding for a light rail train extension from Sierra Madre to Arcadia, Montclair and beyond.

The Pasadena Star-News reported that backers of the Gold Line's eastern extension plan to lobby the MTA Board to vote in January to transfer funds to the project. If approved by MTA, the Gold Line Foothill Extension Authority could make a deal with a contractor, who would start the project and be paid over the years, as Measure R funds trickle in.

The east county transit advocates say construction could begin next year if the borrowing arrangement is approved, with an eye on completion by 2013. If no agreement is in place by January, the extension will not be finished until 2017, the Pasadena Star-News reported.

Drawings of the Gold Line extension were unveiled by the Gold Line Foothill Extension Authority Friday, as plans for a massive viaduct straddling the eastbound Foothill (210) Freeway lanes were presented.

The 739-foot bridge will stretch diagonally across the freeway at an angle, to carry the tracks from the freeway median to its south side near Santa Anita Avenue in Arcadia. It will be adorned by four basket-shaped columns that pay tribute to the basket-weaving of the Chumash Indians.

Officials estimate the bridge will cost $20 million to $25 million.

The proposed extension will continue the Metro Gold Line from its current terminus in East Pasadena through the cities of Arcadia, Monrovia, Duarte, Irwindale, Azusa, Glendora, San Dimas, La Verne, Pomona, Claremont and Montclair.

East county transit advocates say it is in competition with light rail projects in West Los Angeles, the Crenshaw District and Inglewood, as well as the proposed Wilshire Boulevard subway.


Article 2

Metro Gold Line Foothill Extension Holds State of the Project PDF Print E-mail
Posted by mincho2008
Monday, 21 December 2009
Today, the Foothill Extension Construction Authority held its 2009 State of the Project to commemorate 10 years of achievement and usher in its next phase of construction. Featuring a diverse coalition of local, state and federal leaders, and transportation and community advocates, the dialogue underscored the critical deadlines needed to meet the Authority's June 2010 groundbreaking schedule and the growing excitement around the project moving forward.

The San Gabriel Valley's Congressional leadership, Rep. Judy Chu, Rep. David Dreier and Rep. Adam Schiff offered a collective look at the project's past decade while addressing key issues about its future. Their remarks struck a similar note: it is imperative to keep our commitment to the residents of Los Angeles and ensure that the next leg of this vital public transportation project proceeds as planned.

Rep. Schiff outlined the many accomplishments achieved by the Authority during its first decade. "The Gold Line has been very successful in getting people out of their cars, improving traffic and spurring economic development," said Schiff. "I am very excited to see that construction on the extension will begin soon, and I am committed to pushing ahead until the line reaches Ontario Airport."

Citing the enormous benefits the Foothill Extension will bring to the region, Rep. Judy Chu focused on what the Gold Line will mean to local communities. "I'm here to say to the people of the San Gabriel Valley that we heard you -- your demand for the rail line and your desire for less congestion on our freeways, less pollution in our communities and a catalyst for new jobs and economic development. This project will go a long way towards meeting the growing needs of our corridor cities, and I look forward to playing an important role in the work that lies ahead."

Ever mindful of the extraordinary collaboration it took to reach 10 years of achievement, Rep. Dreier spoke with pride and concern about progress moving forward. "I have been a strong advocate for the Foothill Extension from its inception and I'm proud to be a part of the Congressional delegation that came together to voice its support for the project. But we need to make sure that we recommit our advocacy on behalf of this important project, and keep the momentum going to fund the line to Montclair and to LA/Ontario International Airport," stated Dreier. "With unparalleled support from every level of government, we have the opportunity to create a regional transportation system befitting the 21st Century."

During a morning workshop about the project's status and schedule, Habib F. Balian, Construction Authority CEO, and Christopher Burner, Construction Authority Chief Project Officer, told attendees a crucial fund transfer agreement with the Metropolitan Transportation Authority (Metro) must be finalized in January to reach the Phase 2A groundbreaking planned for June. "To meet the Authority charter and Measure R commitments to taxpayers, our mission is clear -- begin construction in June 2010," said Balian. "Today, the Authority is on the cusp of doing just that. With plans being finalized and a community waiting for increased public transit options, we are poised to complete our project to the County line and beyond."

The State of the Project also featured the first look at the project slated to break ground in June, the Iconic Freeway Structure titled The Gateway to the San Gabriel Valley. The Gateway is the bridge that will span Interstate 210 in Arcadia. A scale model of The Gateway was unveiled as artist Andrew Leicester discussed his design process and symbolism.

Researcher Michael Several presented Going for the Gold, an overview of public art featured in Phase 1 from Union Station to Pasadena. Going for the Gold is a collaborative project between USC Libraries and Several, with funding from the California Council for the Humanities' California Story Fund.

State of the Project Workshop presentations will be available later today on the Authority's web site - www.foothillextension.org.

About the Metro Gold Line Construction Authority

The Metro Gold Line Construction Authority is an independent transportation planning and construction agency created in 1999 by the California State Legislature. Its purpose is to extend the Metro Gold Line from Union Station to Montclair, enhancing the transportation experience of commuters in Los Angeles and San Bernardino counties. The Metro Gold Line light rail system opened in 2003, connecting downtown Los Angeles to Pasadena. Funds from Los Angeles County Measure R half-cent sales tax increase will be used for the construction of the Foothill Extension from the Sierra Madre Villa station in Pasadena to Azusa, beginning in 2010.

Roundup on Articles on the Expo Line

Article 1
Delays won't derail Expo project








shadow
















December 19, 2009
DOWNTOWN — Despite delays and cost overruns during Phase One of the Expo Light Rail project, which is expected to link Santa Monica to Downtown Los Angeles by 2015, City Hall officials and mass transit supporters remain confident the project is on track.

The environmental impact report for the rail line's second phase — the portion that will run from Culver City to Downtown Santa Monica — was released on Friday and is slated to come before the Expo authority's board of directors for a vote Feb. 4. Construction could begin by the end of 2010.

Last week the Los Angeles Times reported the first phase of the project, which was originally supposed to open this summer, has fallen more than a year behind schedule and is running $220 million over budget.

But because the line's two phases are separate projects with separate environmental review processes, delays to the first leg don't necessarily affect the Santa Monica segment, said Mayor Pro Tem Pam O'Connor, who sits on the Exposition Metro Line Construction Authority's board of directors.

"It's not like we have to wait until everything in Phase One is done to begin Phase Two," she said.


O'Connor also downplayed cost concerns during the first phase, saying some of the added expenses were because of added infrastructure improvements to the project, not mismanagement. She added the second phase could go more smoothly because of knowledge and experience gained during Phase One.

"Certainly the design-build contracting method (for the second phase) has been refined based on lessons learned," she said.

Supporters of the line are gearing up for a final push as the second phase environmental impact report heads to the board.

"Elected officials need to see there's public support," said Darrell Clarke, who heads the group Friends 4 Expo.

Clarke, a former planning commissioner, agreed that concerns about the first phase don't have bearing on the Santa Monica section's timeline for completion.

"The second half is about a mile shorter," he said. "It's really simpler."

But Kevin Hughes, the president of the Cheviot Hills Homeowners' Association and a past critic of the Expo Authority's handling of the project, said delays during Phase One could cause transportation leaders to expedite Phase Two, while ignoring community groups' concerns.

"Certainly we would expect to hear the argument, 'Hey there's more pressure on you in Phase Two to get this thing moving'" because of Phase One delays, he said.

Hughes' group has asked the Expo Authority to consider putting the rail line underground in the Century City area, citing traffic and safety concerns.

Maintenance yard update

A land swap designed to aid the Expo line's need for a maintenance yard moved ahead last week, as the Santa Monica Community College District Board of Trustees unanimously decided to allow its president to negotiate a deal with City Hall that would compensate the college for SMC-owned land slated to become the rail yard.

Under the plan, a 2.35-acre lot at Stewart Street and Exposition Boulevard currently being used as a parking lot would be used for the maintenance facility. In exchange, City Hall would give the college a lot of equal value located near SMC's Bundy Campus.

Some neighborhood residents have opposed the idea, claiming the proposed rail yard will be yet another environmental blight in an area already impacted by the I-10 Freeway and a solid waste transfer station.

The final EIR for the second phase of the Expo project includes a plan to build a 100-foot buffer aimed at sheltering homes in the vicinity from the proposed facility.


Article 2

Final environmental report issued for pAroposed Expo Line extension

prayitno/Flickr CC
A Metro train nearing downtown Los Angeles, California.
Dec. 20, 2009 | KPCC Wire Services

A Final Environmental Impact report for the proposed Expo Line light rail project has been released, and Westside residents have been told that the hoped-for overpasses cannot be provided near several schoolyards.

The proposed passenger train service will mostly run along the old Southern Pacific tracks from Venice at Robertson boulevards to eastern Santa Monica. The tracks will likely shift to Colorado Boulevard to a proposed downtown terminus three blocks from the pier.

Regional transit authorities have already voted to build the train tracks. The earlier, eastern phase of the project is already under construction between Culver City and downtown Los Angeles, and will be running by 2012.

Regional transit authorities have already voted to build the train tracks. The earlier, eastern phase of the project is already under construction between Culver City and downtown Los Angeles, and will be running by 2012.

The EIR is a government-required study of all imaginable impacts that could be caused by extending passenger train service through the area. The public is allowed to comment on it until Feb. 4.

The Exposition Construction Authority will afterward vote on it, in what will effectively be the final

decision on how to build the $314 million project.

In the final version of the EIR, requests from some Westside residents for overpasses at Westwood Boulevard and Overland Avenue were rejected by the study authors, who said having light-rail tracks crossing the arterial streets will meet safety standards. Elementary schools are nearby those grade

crossings, and state regulatory agencies have ordered MTA to add safety equipment at similar crossings near schools in the Crenshaw District.

But planners said an overpass might be needed to lift the light rail tracks over Sepulveda Boulevard and Sawtelle Avenue, two busy roads that parallel the Santa Monica (10) Freeway under the San Diego (405) Freeway interchange. City of Los Angeles planners convinced the Expo Authority that the

heavy traffic that frequently gridlocks there should not be aggravated with trains.

The Sepulveda-Sawtelle bridge would connect to one planned over the Pico-Gateway boulevards intersection, and Sawtelle Avenue would have to be dropped into a shallow trench so the light rail trains could squeeze under the adjacent 405 viaduct.

The study retains several alternatives for later decision, including whether to eliminate 170 commuter parking spaces proposed for the Westwood Boulevard station, another lightning rod for neighborhood opposition. The decision to ban parking along Colorado Boulevard in Santa Monica, and the exact configuration of the downtown terminus have yet to be determined.

The Los Angeles Times reported last week that the first phase of the Expo Line is late and over-budget. But Santa Monica officials said the ballooning cost was the result of overpasses and other features demanded by stakeholders along the tracks, and said Phase Two is not expected to have such problems.

Many Westside residents have bitterly opposed running up to 24 trains per hour through the expensive, leafy neighborhoods along the abandoned railroad tracks. After that route was adopted, they cited the nearby schools and houses and asked that the train be elevated or put into a trench near Westwood Boulevard and Overland Avenue.

But similar requests were turned down for cost reasons in crowded inner-city neighborhoods, and Expo officials say MTA policies on grade separations for light-rail trains show that the street and pedestrian crossings will be safe, and not congested.

The EIR contains evaluations for not building the train and using buses, but rejects that option because it would require 37 buses and create pollution and congestion. An alternate route, sparing Cheviot Hills but using Sepulveda and Venice boulevards, was rejected as costlier than the old Southern Pacific tracks.

The Final Environmental Impact Report was released late Friday, and is available online at www.buildexpo.org .